Skip to main content

Rachel, Literature's Okay-est Parent



Jeff VanderMeer’s world in Borne is vast and complex, yet its theme is almost exceedingly simple: don’t be an idiot of a parent. This seems to be a deep-rooted theme in science fiction; and, if you really think, shouldn’t be a surprise. The very first science-fiction novel was about the world’s worst parent: Victor Frankenstein. That being said, VanderMeer’s ways of telling his version of this theme is much different than Mary Shelley’s.

First, we’re in a post-apocalyptic setting where parenting is practically impossible. In a flying-bear-eat-human world, there is no time for child rearing. Rachel, our main character, frequently flashes back to her own parents and how life was before, during, and after the apocalypse. She laments she never got to hear their true thoughts and that they put up a front to shield her from the realities of the world affecting her. Rachel eventually finds and “raises” an amorphous creature named Borne, who is a pretty big handful. While definitely not the best parent, Rachel tries and expresses regret when she gets things wrong. We’re also introduced to the Magician’s ruthless and mean children; appropriate to the nature of the city they reside in. They physically beat Rachel to an inch of her life, for Pete's sake. (An obvious example of what not to do with kids.) Then, by the end of the novel after Borne is gone, Rachel adopts more children to take care of - showing that there was a lesson learned.

Since I brought up Frankenstein, I feel that it’s necessary to bring up the similarities of the two stories. Both have human-grown monsters who have gained full sentience. For Frankenstein, it was obviously the monster; and for Borne, it was, well, Borne (and Wick, but he’s not relevant unless he counts as an unsupportive father). Both novels touched on the “how-to”s and “how-not-to”s of raising your horrid, monster child. Both were very vague on how exactly these monster children were made.

So, there are the similarities. What are the differences? Rachael, for one, isn’t the one who made Borne and is therefore never put in the position of God, like Frankenstein was. In fact, she never fully understands Borne or what happens to him. She’s extremely accepting of him, no matter the circumstance. Truly what an adoptive parent should do. Even after finding out about his certain… murderous tendencies, she tries to accommodate and figure out a way around the behavior. Borne, unlike the monster in Frankenstein, doesn’t have a choice in his killing and he never does so for revenge. Rachel also only abandons him after finding that he’s been doing things behind both her and Wick’s back, clearly a consequence of his own actions. Frankenstein, on the other hand, throws any thought of nurture to the wind as soon as his monster is alive.

The biggest difference between Borne and Frankenstein is this: one focuses on the development of an individual as a parent and the resulting trial and error while trying to balance survival. The other is about abandoning your creation and having said creation make your life a living hell because of it. Both are extraordinary examples of a ‘parenting is hard’ theme, and I’m happy there’s at least one parent who’s trying in the sci-fi horror genre.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview With The Vampire's Apeirophobia And Why Everyone But The Vampire Ignores It

One of the many revisited tropes in media is immortality. The idea of seeing and personally experiencing all the world’s disasters in history captivates us, I guess. Anne Rice’s Interview With The Vampire establishes immortality as an integral plot point (the only reason the interview can take place). The narrative, therefore, advances some heavy opinions about the topic, as well as those who seek it. Rice’s novel leaves no doubt about it: being and becoming an immortal is gross. A freak bites your neck, you drink said freak’s blood, and your body slowly shuts down. What remains is your consciousness and blood flow, which you have to supplement in order to survive (which kind of takes away the meaning of immortality). The blood-sucking itself is graphically sensual in Interview With The Vampire, revealing their killing as the last real joy that vampires have - there’s a pun on ‘flirting with death’ somewhere in there. Oh, and you can never see the sun again, so get some spray tan. The...
4 comments
Read more

Frankenstein, Literature's Worst Parent

If one needs a guide on how to be the most oblivious of deadbeat parents, they need only to look to the actions of Victor Frankenstein of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein . There’s nothing that says “World’s Worst Dad” like running out of the house, screaming after finding your eight-foot-something child looming over your sleeping form. Shelley’s entire novel, in essence, is about parenting and the relationships between fathers and their children - with the added element of being the first work of science fiction. Before getting into the analysis of the various facts, which point this towards being a parental “how-to”, it’s important to briefly mention Shelley’s own upbringing and how it relates to said analysis. Shelly was born to William Godwin, a philosopher, and novelist, and Mary Wollstonecraft, a well-known English suffragette who penned “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman”, in 1797. Two weeks after Shelley’s birth, Wollstonecraft died due to postpartum infections. Shelley’s rigor...
2 comments
Read more

"How To Not Be a Horrible Person", AKA Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman

Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman is, overall, a novel about family. A really dysfunctional, not super healthy family, but about family nonetheless. The novel follows two brothers through their adventure of meeting each other for the first time after many, many years, and the frustration behind both their clashing personalities and the death of their father. Anansi Boys also shows the importance of family, with how Fat Charlie and Spider (the respective brothers) save each other in different ways, as well as the influence of their father, the god Anansi, on their lives. This novel also explores the unpredictability of life. The boys’ lives don’t quite work out the way both they think they should - defying both their and the audience’s expectations. Anansi dying unexpectedly, which hits both boys hard (in Charlie’s case, harder than it should) is extremely unexpected to everyone in the novel, though it’s revealed he’ll come back in a few years. Rosie, Fat Charlie’s fiancée, at the be...
1 comment
Read more